With Regard To Anti- Social Behaviour Orders, What Have Been The Most

With Regard To Anti- Social Behaviour Orders, What Have Been The Most With Regard To Anti- Social Behaviour Orders, What Have Been The Most Significant Sources Of â€" Essay Example > 3. Bad neighbourhood, negligence by the community and neighbours, absence of social commitment4. Peer pressure and lack of individuality that involves in problem behaviour. The framing of laws and their enforcement will show only minimum effect in controlling the anti social behaviour. Consider the drug trafficking. The details of laws enacted were available from 1940. 65 years of laws making and their enforcement, punishments did not completely eradicate the drug trafficking. The same is the thing with the other types of anti social behaviour also. The cause for the anti social behaviour will be different in different periods. In 60s the youth used to be drug addicts. Addicting to drugs used to be considered as anti social in those days. Internationally many laws are framed and implemented on the name of UN conventions. Still the government did not completely eradicate the drug abuse. There are many patients in the country who are being treated for drug abuse. Let us consider the educational angle in drugs. The pharmaceutical drugs are being manufactured illegally in many countries globally and even in UK it goes unnoticed up to a little extent. This type of anti social behaviour cannot be controlled by mere law enforcement. At the same time one cannot ignore the role of law enforcement and criminal justice system. They play a major role in controlling anti social behaviour, but the fact is that the social and welfare points of view also must be taken to control the anti social behaviour in some sections of the society. What is needed other than enforcement of law: Government should emphasise on underlying causes to control Anti social behaviour other than law enforcement. According to survey conducted for Joseph Rowntree foundation tells that the majority of the people believe in prevention than the enforcement or punishment. Twenty percent of the people believed in tough action and 11 percent of the people believed in the combination o both prevention a nd enforcement. The study was conducted at King’s college London. It reveals that the residents of the neighbourhoods experiencing anti social behaviour are offering different solutions to the problem. This is due to the fact that the difference in the people facing the anti social behaviour. The family which is a victim of anti social behaviour and have an anti social element in it will probably suggest a combination of prevention and enforcement. The families who are just victims of anti social behaviour may feel the tough enforcement and strong punishment may address the problem. The administration should take majority opinion and the fact that really addresses the problem into consideration. When development of a policy is concerned, the enforcement and punishment are a must and inseparable part of the solution. Even though we can observe that mere enforcement and punishment did not decrease the anti social behaviour in the country and all over the world. The necessity and t he probability of committing the behaviour also will matter. The atmosphere should be in such a manner to prevent the anti social behaviour activities of any person.